MOOCs, SPOCs and next generation Open Access Learning
17.9K views | +0 today
Follow
MOOCs, SPOCs and next generation Open Access Learning
Examining the development of the Massive Open Online Course and its variants.
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...

Popular Tags

Current selected tags: 'Coursera', 'networked learning'. Clear
Rescooped by Peter Mellow from Learning with MOOCs
Scoop.it!

The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses | David G. Glance, Martin Forsey & Miles Riley - First Monday

In 2011, the respective roles of higher education institutions and students worldwide were brought into question by the rise of the massive open online course (MOOC). MOOCs are defined by signature characteristics that include: lectures formatted as short videos combined with formative quizzes; automated assessment and/or peer and self–assessment and an online forum for peer support and discussion. Although not specifically designed to optimise learning, claims have been made that MOOCs are based on sound pedagogical foundations that are at the very least comparable with courses offered by universities in face–to–face mode. To validate this, we examined the literature for empirical evidence substantiating such claims. Although empirical evidence directly related to MOOCs was difficult to find, the evidence suggests that there is no reason to believe that MOOCs are any less effective a learning experience than their face–to–face counterparts. Indeed, in some aspects, they may actually improve learning outcomes.


Via Peter B. Sloep, Peter Mellow
Maria Persson's comment, May 26, 2013 9:00 PM
Appreciate your comments Paulo - insightful and provokes further thought. Thanks for the comment.
Peter B. Sloep's comment, May 31, 2013 6:46 AM
Great comment Paulo!
Hein Holthuizen's curator insight, September 29, 2013 3:27 AM

A great outcome for those who don't like travelling (not me) and want to train/teach those who are in need of knowledge they are able to give.

Rescooped by Kim Flintoff from SENSES project: Assembling your digital toolkit
Scoop.it!

Thoughts from a MOOC Pioneer — Academic Technology | Gene Roche

Thoughts from a MOOC Pioneer — Academic Technology | Gene Roche | MOOCs, SPOCs and next generation Open Access Learning | Scoop.it

"Recently Scott E. Page did a presentation at the University of Wisconsin Center for Educational Innovation where he reviewed his experience teaching his Model Thinking course twice through online course provider Coursera. .. The presentation runs a little more than an hour, ... [it] gives is a very interesting insight into the process of creating a very successful MOOC ... It’s not very often that I sit through an hour-long video, but this one really did grab my attention. It was a well-told story by a thoughtful academic who believes that universities have the capacity to share important ideas with learners who never would have had access to them before." 


Via Peter B. Sloep, Susie Macfarlane
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight, January 22, 2013 5:09 PM

I did not sit through the entire video, so you have to take Gene Roche's word for it. However, Gene's blog post gives a very good summary of what it takes to produce a MOOC and what Page's mission was when producing it. There's one sentence I want to share with you here: "As he [Page] emphasizes several times throughout the program, the real mission of the university is having an impact on the way students (and others) think — not in turning a profit." That of course stands in an interesting contrast with the intentions of the MOOC providers. (@pbsloep)

Rescooped by Peter Mellow from Learning with MOOCs
Scoop.it!

Essays on the flaws of peer grading in MOOCs | Jonathan Rees - Inside Higher Ed

Essays on the flaws of peer grading in MOOCs | Jonathan Rees - Inside Higher Ed | MOOCs, SPOCs and next generation Open Access Learning | Scoop.it

The implicit assumption of any peer grading arrangement is that students with minimal direction can do what humanities professors get paid to do and I think that’s the fatal flaw of these arrangements. This assumption not only undermines the authority of professors everywhere; it suggests that the only important part of college instruction is the content that professors transmit to their students.


Via Peter B. Sloep, Learning Environments
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight, March 6, 2013 3:38 PM

A insightful and thorough critique of why peer grading in the humanities won't work. Jonathan Rees is a professor of history himself who uses peer assessment in this classes a lot certainly is the right person to pass judgement (note the difference between assessment and grading, the former is formative, the latter summative). And it is negative. Indeed, he argues that if this practice were to catch on, it suggests grading (in the humanities) is easy, while in actual fact it is through careful comments and not the grades per se that people learn. Actuallly, I think this applies quite generallly. It is through reflection that you learn deeply, good feedback helps you reflect more deeply and a grade isn't good feedback. (@pbsloep)

Rescooped by Peter Mellow from Networked Learning - MOOCs and more
Scoop.it!

MOOCs on the Move: How Coursera Is Disrupting the Traditional Classroom - Knowledge@Wharton

MOOCs on the Move: How Coursera Is Disrupting the Traditional Classroom by Knowledge@Wharton, the online business journal of the Wharton School.

 

Comment: good, sensible interview with Coursera's Daphne Koller, about the difference between xMOOCs and traditional education, about credits and certificates, about (peer) assessment, about the business model. Intesting is her toned-down prediction for where Coursera will be in 10 years time: 

"I also think that in five to 10 years, from the perspective of the higher education ecosystem, people will look back on the 20th century and say, "I can't believe that we spent so much of our students' time shoveling them into auditoria and having them sit there for 75 minutes while somebody lectured at them." We will all clearly recognize that this is not the best form for getting people to learn material and use it effectively. I think our notion of what makes for a good education will shift drastically.

That's right, at least I hope, but that was not the question. I would have loved to hear what she thinks Coursera's or for that matter the MOOCs' role will have been in this. For if we let people watch the sage on the stage through a computer screen rather than in an auditorium, nothing has fundamentally changed. And that is what we need. And there may be room for MOOCs then, or not. (peter sloep, @pbsloep)


Via Peter B. Sloep
No comment yet.