Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
This is a useful free plagiarism checker. It's always good to check your assignments, just in case you missed referencing a quote. Via Nik Peachey, Peter Mellow 
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Scoop.it!
Turnitin training webinars are offered several times a week to help you get started with using Turnitin...
Whether you're new or just need a refresher, Turnitin offers instructors live, online training sessions with a product specialist to help you get started with using Turnitin.
In each session, we'll demonstrate how to join an institutional account, create a profile, and navigate the instructor homepage. Then we'll move onto creating classes and assignments, enrolling students, submitting papers, and how to manage assignments and students. We'll take you into OriginalityCheck and show you how to navigate and interpret originality reports, and we'll go into GradeMark to show you how to add comments and feedback on a paper, as well as how to create and use rubrics.
Scoop.it!
Turnitin is the leading academic plagiarism detector, utilized by teachers and students to avoid plagiarism and ensure academic integrity.
Turnitin recently added the ability to add colored highlights with comments to student papers in GradeMark. Instead of only a plain yellow highlighter, you can now choose from five colors—blue, green, yellow, pink, and purple.
Scoop.it!
The Office of the Independent Adjudicator's annual report is expected to show a steep rise in students who feel they have been treated harshly... (UK)
Some universities are letting students down by failing to warn them about plagiarism and its consequences until it is too late, says the official who deals with student complaints.
Scoop.it!
Affordable webinar software. Create online presentations with synchronized video and PowerPoint.
Scoop.it!
Research into current practice in the construction and use of marking rubrics for online discussions.
Scoop.it!
William Lounsbury for The Chronicle"It's important that the research community improve perhaps as quickly as the cheating community is improving," says Neal Kingston, of the U. of Kansas, who organized a Conference on Statistical Detection of Potential Test Fraud.
Scoop.it!
REVIEW is a web-based Assurance of Learning (AoL) solution, allowing Universities to automate marking of criteria-based assessment of students, formulated by program learning goals and graduate attributes.
Scoop.it!
This rubric may be used for assessing individual blog entries, including comments on peers’ blogs.
University of Wisconsin
Scoop.it!
|
|
Scooped by Kim Flintoff |
Scoop.it!
This online seminar explores frequent low-stakes grading which is beneficial in higher education because it keeps students focused...
Check out the slide show here: http://www.drexel.edu/provost/dcae/2010NFOLowStakesGrading.pdf
|
|
Rescooped by Kim Flintoff from Educational Technology in Higher Education |
Scoop.it!
One of the frustrating things I found in teaching online last semester was the lack of direct contact with students. The class felt impersonal, despite my efforts to give it life.
I found that especially frustrating when I graded assignments. The feedback seemed cold and distant, even as I as I tried to point out strong areas of writing and multimedia projects.
|
|
Scooped by Kim Flintoff |
Scoop.it!
Plagiarism Advice has been providing resources, training, advice and guidance to the education sector since 2002 to help address growing concerns about plagiarism.
The programme for the 5th International Plagiarism Conference is now available with details of all keynotes and parallel sessions. Please note content and timings are subject to change.
The programme reflects cross-cultural views and challenges to addressing plagiarism from teachers and academics representing institutions from 15 countries from around the globe. Papers showcase cultural perspectives on plagiarism and academic integrity, tried and tested strategies for encouraging students to produce rewarding and original academic work, institutional approaches and developments in use of detection technologies.
|
|
Scooped by Kim Flintoff |
Scoop.it!
I found that especially frustrating when I graded assignments. The feedback seemed cold and distant, even as I as I tried to point out strong areas of writing and multimedia projects.
I overcame this in part by using my iPad to add audio comments to grading. This was a revelation to me. Using an app called iAnnotate, I could write comments on PDFs but also add voice comments, allowing me to make grading more personal but also add details that I otherwise wouldn’t have included.
|
Rescooped by Peter Mellow from Educational iPad User Group |
Scoop.it!
Apple has added in some controls to Guided Access that lets teachers turn off the ability to use Safari to look up answers while taking a test. In fact, you can disable and enable all sorts of custom controls. You can use ‘Single App Mode’ where a student can ONLY use the app that’s delivering the test.
|
|
Rescooped by Peter Mellow from Educational Technology News |
Scoop.it!
"When doing homework, many students turn to the same websites as they do when they're surfing the web. Four of the top ten most-cited websites on Easybib, a site used to create more than 500 million citations, are user-generated sites like Wikipedia and YouTube."
|
|
Scooped by Kim Flintoff |
Scoop.it!
The online FREE plagiarism checker. Check your paper online!
In this technological age a plagiarism checker is essential for protecting your written work. A plagiarism checker benefits teachers, students, website owners and anyone else interested in protecting their writing. Our service guarantees that anything you write can be thoroughly checked by our plagiarism software to insure that your texts are unique. The process of checking your work for plagiarism can be broken down into these simple steps.
|
|
Scooped by Peter Mellow |
Scoop.it!
|
|
Scooped by Kim Flintoff |
Scoop.it!
A professor in the College of Biological Science at the University of Guelph wanted to lead his senior students through the process of writing, revising, and submitting a peer-reviewed article.
PEAR, a peer evaluation, assessment, and review tool, developed in Teaching Support Services (now the Centre for Open Learning and Educational Support) facilitates and automates much of the administrative work associated with student peer review, making it more practical for learning,even with large classes.
|
Scooped by Learning Futures |
Scoop.it!
The Office of Educational Technology at the U.S. Department of Education asked SRI to talk to industry experts and convene a panel of researchers to understand the state of the art, the state of the practice, and the emerging field of learning analytics and educational data mining.
We’re pleased to announce that a draft of the report is now available.
|
|
Scooped by Peter Mellow |
Scoop.it!
Turnitin is the leading academic plagiarism detector, utilized by teachers and students to avoid plagiarism and ensure academic integrity.
|
|
Scooped by Peter Mellow |
Scoop.it!
Rubrics for Assessment Information, Cooperative Learning, Research Process/Report, PowerPoint/Podcast, Oral Presentation, Web Page and Portfolio, Math, Art, Science, Video and Multimedia Project , Creating Rubrics, Writing, Rubrics for Primary Grades...
|
|
Scooped by Kim Flintoff |
Scoop.it!
Abstract:
The hurried pace of the modern classroom does not permit formative feedback on writing assignments at the frequency or quality recommended by the research literature. One solution for increasing individual feedback to students is to incorporate some form of computer-generated assessment. This study explores the use of automated assessment of student writing in a content-specific context (history) on both traditional and non-traditional tasks. Four classrooms of middle school history students completed two projects, one culminating in an essay and one culminating in a digital documentary. From the total set of completed projects, approximately 70 essays and 70 digital documentary scripts were then scored by human raters and by an automated evaluation system. The student essays were used to test the comparison of human and computer-generated feedback in the context of history education, and the digital documentary scripts were used to test feedback given on a non-traditional task. The results were encouraging with very high correlation and reliability factors within and across both sets of documents, suggesting the possibility of new forms of formative assessment of student writing for content-area instruction in a variety of emerging formats.
