Digital transformations are, by their very nature, complex. There are multiple moving parts, integrated processes and technologies, and the need for expertise that cannot already be found in the company. In most firms, however, there is a small cadre of technology professionals who can impose relative order on the proceedings. CEOs and CIOs should consider the benefits of pulling enterprise architects closer to the center: bringing them to the table with business leaders, devising metrics that reveal the value of their work, and creating the type of incentives that will challenge them and prompt them to stay for the long term. Such an approach is critical not just for limiting risk and protecting against the potential challenges and downsides of digital transformations but also for ensuring a clear upside—a close and lasting partnership between the business and IT.
WHY IT MATTERS: this chart from McKinsey highlights the high use of spreadsheet for planning and seems to directly link to the type of systems in use (SAP appears bad for people to get the data they need but more modern systems like E2Open do not seem to suffer the same faith). In my experience I use the inventory of excels that people use as a proxy to how good (or bad) the IT systems are.